5 min read

Docket+ 19 February

Docket+ is a weekly roundup of the latest influence operations-related academic research, events and job opportunities.
Docket+ 19 February
Photo credit: Photo by Prateek Katyal on Unsplash

Hi! I'm Victoria and welcome to DisinfoDocket. Docket+ is a weekly roundup of the latest influence operations-related academic research, events and job opportunities.

Did you know that DisinfoDocket takes requests? If you have suggestions or relevant work that you'd like to see included, simply reply to this email and send us the details!

Highlights

  1. Disinformation: A Back Pocket Guide: A review of Lee McIntyre, “On Disinformation: How to Fight for Truth and Protect Democracy” (MIT 2023) (Lawfare, 16 February)
  2. PORTAL KOMBAT: A structured and coordinated pro-Russian propaganda network (Viginum, February)
  3. Digital Risks to the 2024 Elections: Safeguarding Democracy in the Era of Disinformation (NYU Stern, February)
  4. Measuring what matters: Investigating what new types of assessments reveal about students’ online source evaluations (Harvard Misinformation Review, 12 February)

1. Academia & Research

1.1 Platforms & Technology

  1. ‘Choice Screen’ Fever Dream: Enforcers' New Favorite Remedy Won’t Blunt Google’s Search Monopoly (Tech Policy Press, 15 February)
  2. On Social Media, Transparency Reporting is Anything But Transparent (Tech Policy Press, 15 February)
  3. TikTok: Hate the Game, Not the Player (DFRLab, 14 February)
  4. Do  You  Speak  Disinformation?  Computational  Detection  of  Deceptive  News-Like  Content  Using  Linguistic  and  Stylistic  Features (T&F, 15 February)
  5. Why Is Instagram Search More Harmful Than Google Search? (Integrity Institute, 13 February)

AI

  1. AI and the Future of Democracy in Africa: Navigating the Promise and the Peril (Tech Policy Press, 16 February)
  2. Hacking with AI (DFRLab, 15 February)
  3. Lying Blindly: Bypassing ChatGPT's Safeguards to Generate Hard-to-Detect Disinformation Claims at Scale (ArXiv, 13 February)

Susceptibility to disinformation

  1. People Who Believe Implausible Claims are not Cognitive Misers: Evidence from Evaluation Tasks (OSF, 16 February)

This post is for paying subscribers only